Archive for the ‘Research visits’ Category

“There is something in the New York air that makes sleep useless.” – Simone de Beauvoir

I’ll tell you something – before heading off to New York City, I wasn’t that excited. I had been to NYC before and thought that it’s too big, too loud, too crowded. But it happened that Yaacov Trope, the researcher I wanted to work with, is at New York University. I thought “Well, living in New York City for half a year is not the worst thing that can happen to you”. When the plane took off on August 22nd 2018 and I miraculously got upgraded to business class, I was joking that this would set the tone for my time there. Turns out that it actually did.

Some of the notable events of my stay (and these are just the work-related ones):

  • Finding my apartment, which was a 10 min walk away from NYU (only affordable thanks to the SNSF grant I received, and it still had roaches)
  • Presenting four times in the Trope lab and receiving incredibly valuable feedback every single time
  • Being invited to give a talk at Princeton University and catching up with the people I had worked with in 2014
  • Visiting Tom Gilovich and his lab at Cornell University (this time by bus, so that American Airlines didn’t have a chance to lose my suitcase again and make me present in leggings and sneakers)
  • Attending the SESP conference in Seattle (see also my earlier blog post) and the SPSP conference in Portland
  • Being able to attend seminars, talks, and journal clubs at the NYU Stern School of Business, which led to a research project with Adam Alter and Yaacov

I would like to thank Yaacov and his lab members, NYU, the SNSF, and my great colleagues in Basel for making this experience possible! (and for enduring numerous Skype calls with lousy sound quality …)

“New York is an ugly city, a dirty city. Its climate is a scandal, its politics are used to frighten children, its traffic is madness, its competition is murderous. But there is one thing about it: Once you have lived in New York and it has become your home, no place else is good enough.”  John Steinbeck


Annual Meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology

Seattle is not exactly a short trip from Europe, but while I am a visiting researcher at NYU, I thought the 6h flight might be worth it and I was not disappointed. The SESP convention is a small (2018: 347 participants) and quite “exclusive” conference, in the sense that it is for members only and you have to fulfill certain criteria before you can become a member. Likewise, there are only sessions but no posters and only researchers holding a PhD are allowed to present. As an interested PhD student, however, you can sneak in by being “hosted” by a member attending the conference.

Three things that stood out for me:

  • In contrast to SPSP, the research presented is very recent and often in progress, so you get to know what people are literally working on right now.
  • The quality of talks was extremely high throughout the conference. I would not go ahead and say it is because you can only present when holding a PhD, but who knows.
  • The attendance list read like the who is who of social psychology. You should better ask me who was not there than who was there.

My personal highlights included the preconference workshop on female leadership in which I had the pleasure to experience Diane Mackie playing my stubborn teaching assistant, the fatty pretzels and molten processed cheese that should mimic cheese fondue, and the session on the psychology of newness with talks on overconfidence (by Dave Dunning, see picture), updating impressions, sexuality after marriage, and that people are more likely to destroy their phones when they know that an upgrade is released soon.

Lastly, Seattle is the perfect place for moody Sunday morning pictures by the water.

Research visit at the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour

IMG_2117

Variety is not only the spice of life, it is also an important source for ideas and progress in science. Experiencing new labs, talking to different people, learning new methods: these are the goals for my current research visit to the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging in Nijmegen (Netherlands, but not Holland!)

Until the end of February I am with the ‘Motivational and Cognitive Control’ group led by Roshan Cools, where I will be working with Guillaume Sescousse on analysing behavioural and neuroimaging data from a risky choice task. As communication is key to scientific exchange and progress, I will also give two talks about my research at Cognitive and Decision Sciences in Basel.

The institute here is buzzing with activity, people, talks, and events, and I look forward to spending a few weeks immersed in all things ‘neuro’. For a bit of balance, later this week there will be a talk entitled ‘Against neurofetishism’; just to keep the critical hat firmly in place.